The University of Washington will be Coalition exclusive next year. |
Without
fanfare or press release, last Thursday the
Coalition for Access, Affordability, and Success quietly launched the first two
components of its new online technology—the Student Locker (a portfolio
development tool) and the Collaboration Space (a platform for sharing
materials).
And so
far, the initial response from independent educational consultants (IECs) has been largely
positive.
“After
seeing the Locker and then using it, this may be the most important part of the
Coalition’s work. For those students with unstable educational, economic, and
home lives, they now have a place to store resumes and graded papers as well as
perhaps other information—a teacher recommendation,” explained Jeana Kawamura,
an IEC based in Newport Beach, California. “I thought that the Locker was the
weak link. I was wrong. Not every student has College Planner Pro, a well-run,
thoughtful CBO [Community Based Organization] or an IEC.”
Many of
the consultants who have taken the time to explore the Locker agree.
“I was
pleasantly surprised, actually,” said Pam Shor, an IEC with offices in
Washington State. “I appreciate the college research capability—particularly as
some schools appear to make understanding application requirements a little
easier. If schools continue to develop the information on these pages, I feel
it will help students research schools and connect with them more effectively.”
A demo posted on the coalition website
and led by Colin Johnson, interim executive director, walks the viewer through
registration, profile completion, document sharing, and college search. With all the advantages of being “newer,” the
coalition platform has much to like.
“I had a minor glitch when creating my account
and signing up. The interface did not prompt me to check my email before
logging in again—students will have to be reminded that the verification email
could land in spam,” explained Archana Sudame, a northern California-based
IEC. “But after that, completing the
profile and uploading stuff in the locker was a breeze—50 MB is substantial. In
fact, the best feature about the Locker is that it accepts files directly from
my Google Drive or Drop Box, so I can work on a computer that has no hard
drive, like a Chrome Book.”
According
to the coalition demo, the locker will accept Word Docs, JPEG, MP3s and
MP4s. “If you can drop it in Drop Box or
upload it to YouTube, you can store it in your Locker.” Students have the
choice of using drag-and-drop or uploading individual files into their lockers.
And the
contents of a student’s Locker are not visible to any outside person or
organization. Individual documents or files may be “shared” with an invited
mentor, but that mentor will not have universal access to the Locker. No
changes or edits to a document will be possible through this process—only
comments, which are restricted to a column located on the side of the shared
document.
In
addition, the list of student mentors will not be universally shared. Only the
student will know who all his or her mentors are.
Down the
line, the Coalition will be expanding the student “profile” to add a
self-reported academic section and a standardized testing section. Between 60
and 95 percent of an individual institution’s application will be contained within
the student profile, depending on how complex or detailed member questions are.
In the
meantime, questions inquiring about ethnicity and dual citizenship, as well as the
ability of students to rate level of interest in different academic areas or
the status of investigations into individual colleges, received high marks from
IECs.
“I was
encouraged by the ease and intuitiveness of the student section. I found it
very easy to navigate,” added Kawamura.
“I think that this will be very helpful to students. Maybe in the future
it will be an art teacher or English teacher that suggests to a student to
place work in the Locker. I could see that as a real possibility.”
Additionally,
a student developing a college list for the Locker, which can include coalition
as well as non-coalition schools, can decide on a school-by-school basis
whether or not to allow sharing of basic information with individual colleges
and universities. With each decision, the student is reminded that the college
will have access to name, mobile phone number, email, home phone number, mailing address,
and other information that can serve to facilitate communication or
demonstrate interest. The student can opt out of sharing at any time for any
coalition member college, although once sent, it’s hard to take back.
But despite
all the positive reaction, not everyone was totally sold.
“I did
notice that there is no designated place for independent educational
consultants (IECs) to log in,” said Rachelle Wolosoff, an IEC with offices in
New York and Florida. “Since there is an increasing number of IECs helping
students these days, I would think it would have been, at a minimum, courteous
to have provided the particular login for IECs.”
Another
IEC added, “I think this locker/app is going to increase stress and work for
students (and high school counselors and IECs)…Many underserved students do not
have computers, which is another hurdle (so their papers may not even be
typed), not to mention they often lack scanners. Unless teachers/counselors
help the students upload to the locker at school, on school computers, I do not
see the vast majority of this population taking advantage of this application.”
And
Jeana Kawarmura cautioned, “In California, the student to counselor ratio is
obscenely high. I don’t see how the majority of high school counselors are
going to be able to mentor students through the locker collaborative space. I
also want to make sure that I am not doing anything on my end that places more
responsibilities on them.”
This would be particularly true of schools and counselors working with Naviance, as that system will not be fully integrated with the Coalition platform until year-two.
It’s
clear that the Locker is still a work-in-progress, and the full application
will not come on line until July. Between now and then, however, coalition
staff members have indicated a willingness to accept and consider comments on
any element of the technology.
Already
changes were made between the time the demo was produced and the technology was
launched last week. For example, the required question asking for the “Gender” of the applicant was changed to
“Sex” and a note added that coalition members would be asking for information
about gender on their individual applications.
In the
meantime, school-based and independent college counselors are considering if and
how to introduce the coalition application to students, with many opting to
take a wait-and-see position.
“Of
course, we will review all the options including the coalition application, but
my thinking is that in this first year of the new coalition platform, many
students will want to keep it simple and do the Common
Application for
all colleges on the Common App, rather than have multiple apps to complete,”
said Mary Spiegel, a Connecticut-based certified educational planner.
Others
are getting ready to jump right in.
“I
emailed my juniors and told them they could start,” said Wendie Lubic, an IEC
located in Washington, D.C. “It will be
interesting to see who starts…and what their experience is.”
No comments:
Post a Comment