Cooper Union will be joining the Common App for 2014-15 |
Responding to concerns
voiced by both member institutions and the counseling
community, the Board voted to make several key changes for 2014-15,
including:
Live Support. A serious point of contention since the
introduction of the electronic application has been the inability of Common App
users to reach “live” technical support.
To address this problem, the Common App has decided to “pilot” chat
support targeted to “our most challenging constituency which is our
recommenders.” Noting that they require “more
handholding,” Lesley Hargreaves, the Common App’s director of operations and
support, announced the pilot program will begin in October—a peak time for tech
support requests—and will be limited to recommenders only.
Paper Application. Noting that the paper version of the Common
Application has been “a valued and missed advising resource,” Scott Anderson, director
of outreach, announced that the Common App will be providing a PDF version of
the application which will essentially be what was thought of as the CA3, only
undated and revised to contain the current essay prompts. For colleges wishing to have a version with specific
member questions (particularly for those schools that continue to enroll
students during July when the Common App goes on hiatus), the Common App
membership services team will work with individual admissions offices to develop
those documents.
Slideroom. As a service to applicants submitting
arts portfolios, the Common App will be making Slideroom available to all
member colleges and universities and not just those institutions agreeing to be
at the “Exclusive II” membership level.
Because of contractual obligations, Non-Exclusive and Exclusive I
colleges will have to pay for the service this year. Fees will be revisited next year.
Transfer Registrar
Report. For this year, the Transfer
Registrar Report will be going off line.
The Common App promises to convene a focus group on the transfer process
and make decisions about how this information will be conveyed in the future.
Navigation and
Question Clarification.
Acknowledging that “readability was a challenge” for last year’s
applicants, the Common App will be making adjustments to various application
questions. Specifically mentioned were
questions pertaining to race/ethnicity, fee waivers, current year courses, and
a return to the grid format for school reports.
The Common App has already convened a focus group of high school students
to test new questions and promises to make more of an effort to get feedback
from potential student-applicants before going live on August 1.
Testing Time. In addition to adding “project and program
management skills” to the technology team, Chad Massie, director of technology,
introduced a comprehensive timeline with milestones leading to the August 1
launch. Included in the timeline were
nine weeks of testing time during which institutions will be able to work with
the system and make appropriate alignments with enrollment management software.
While 2013-14 presented a “significant challenge” to the
Common Application, the good news is that the independent
evaluation conducted by Censeo revealed that the CA4 system architecture is
“fundamentally sound.” The organization will continue its plan to establish
independence from Hobsons under the interim
leadership of Paul Mott and hopes to see continued growth in membership as
well as system utilization.
And almost anticipating some of the issues raised in the
suit filed by CollegeNET, “enrollment leaders” attending the conference took up
questions involving organizational mission, the role and composition of the
board, governance, and pricing.
In an open forum, they discussed key matters that have
plagued the organization for years, such as, is the Common App a technology
vendor, a policy organization, a service provider, or all of the above? What group(s) should provide recommendations
and direction to the Common Application?
And how should the Common App price its services?
While the enrollment leaders agreed the Common App’s mission
should include a little of all the options presented and the board is primarily
responsible to its members, there was little agreement about pricing. Opinions were fairly equally divided among pricing
structures that included “exclusivity” driven, flat fee, feature driven or
platform driven. School application fee
driven—assessing a percentage of fees charged applicants—was the only option voted
down.
In the interest of “proactive and transparent
communications,” Board President Thyra Briggs revealed that the Common
Application budget for FY 13 was $14 million; for FY14, it should be $15
million; and for FY 15, the budget is projected to be between $15 and $16
million. Because of a series of expected
and unexpected one-time expenses for this year, reserves have been seriously
depleted, but in the future, the board plans to build reserves covering one to
two years of the operating budget.
And ten years ago, in 2004, the Common App employed fewer than 2 full time staff members. This year, the organization will employ 50 full time equivalent staffers.
No comments:
Post a Comment