Princeton University |
Apparently
frustrated with ongoing problems at the Common Application, Princeton University quietly brought
on the Universal College Application (UCA) this weekend to
provide an alternative to the beleaguered
Common App electronic application system and redirect students to a more
user-friendly application.
Previously
listed as an “exclusive”
member of the Common Application, Princeton—along with 516 other member institutions—has
endured a series
of technical issues ranging from inability to access (or read) submitted
applications, missing recommendations and transcripts, and the loud clamor of
public distrust of an application product that periodically crashes and refuses
to provide strong customer support.
The
final blow may have been a letter to Common Application member colleges
advising that changes to “configurations” will not be allowed after October 18.
“…
any future changes will create more confusion among students and recommenders,
and will cause disturbances in data processing that would ultimately have a
ripple effect in development as we work to remedy current issues,” according to
Kirk Daulerio, the Common Application director of member relations.
This
suggests that colleges, which may have yet to see the first application,
will be barred from making adjustments to deadlines and requirements after
they finally see how the flow of applications and supporting materials has been
affected by Common Application technical problems.
In
the meantime, other non-exclusive members have begun aggressively touting alternative
applications or completely removing all links to the Common Application on
their webpages.
“As
you may know, The Common Application has had some unusual challenges this year,
and many colleges are having difficulty receiving information submitted through
The Common Application in a timely manner,” said Wes Waggoner, dean of SMU’s undergraduate admissions, in a
letter to prospective applicants. “If
you have not yet applied, you may also use SMU's Online Application to
apply for admission.”
The
fact that Princeton opted to bolt to the
UCA mid-application cycle could be a strong indication of how serious
Common App problems have become and a clear signal of dissatisfaction among
important members of the organization.
Over
the past several years, Princeton has traveled with the University of Virginia and Harvard University for recruitment programs
all over the country. In these
presentations, Harvard has made clear its
support for the work of the Universal College Application and underscored
the need
for continued competition in the application industry.
It
appears the message is finally getting through that as good (or bad) as the
Common Application may have been or will be in the future, competition serves
to strengthen the industry as a whole. Colleges that blindly signed on as exclusive users of an
untested product did not do themselves or potential applicants a favor.
For
the record, of the three traveling partners, the University of Virginia remains
steadfastly loyal to the Common Application and its dean of admission currently
retains a seat on the Common Application Board of Directors.
No comments:
Post a Comment