After a fairly serious drubbing
in the press and among standardized test experts questioning the validity
of a partially scored exam, the College
Board quietly announced a test “fee waiver” for students who took the
botched June 6 exam. So far, the waiver
applies only to the October 3 test date, but allows students who don’t think
they trust the June results to retake the test at the College Board’s expense.
Without repeating all the
sad details of the June 6 SAT Reasoning Test, it’s fair to say that the
small “printing error” found in test booklets distributed to thousands of
test-takers has blossomed into a major problem for the College Board. Even though the Educational
Testing Service took the fall for the error and conflicting instructions on
timing for two sections of the test, the Board has exacerbated the problem by
coming up with a series of half solutions that raise more
questions than they answer.
In fact, the College Board seems to be totally playing
things by ear and responding to issues as they go along, instead of formulating
a single well-thought-out strategy to cover how they intend to address the
problem and help students make good decisions about what to do about it. To date, the response has been piecemeal and largely
directed to reassuring test-takers (and colleges) that results from June are good
to use for admissions decisions.
Although counselors on the College Board mailing list received
an initial statement from the Board explaining what happened and assuring
everyone that the tests were valid enough even if a section or two
might have been compromised, all subsequent tweaks to the Board’s response to
the increasingly complex problem have been in a series of edits to their website.
Last
week’s edit advised test-takers that the compromised reading and math
sections simply would not be scored. This was a change from the initial
statement indicating only one section would have to be thrown out. But don’t worry. The College Board assures us that they “will
still be able to provide reliable scores for all students who took the SAT on
June 6.” And they expect to deliver
these scores within the usual time frame.
FairTest, however,
begged to disagree. How is it that 22
percent of the June SAT, administered to almost half a million students, can
simply be dropped? The decision not to
score two entire sections of the test is unprecedented in the history of the
SAT and seems less than comparable to the “fire drill” or electrical outage
scenarios to which the situation has been compared.
This week, the College
Board changed direction on the question of whether or not students who
weren’t satisfied with having two sections of the test left unscored could have
a free retake. While suggesting that the
delay in responding to requests for a retake was to save students the added
stress of having to decide about sitting for the test again, the College Board
writes that they have “waived the fee for the October SAT administration for
students who let us know that their testing experience was negatively affected
by the printing error….”
No further explanations or directions are provided. And with the offer of a free retake, the
matter of test validity seems even more questionable than ever, presumably
leaving colleges with a great big question mark about June 6.
At the end of the day, the College Board appears to be
leaving the matter of retesting to the students and those who advise them. But before making this decision, there are a
number of questions that come to mind:
- Will students be allowed to see the June 6 test results before committing to the free retake in October?
- Is there a time frame within which retake requests must be made?
- In what form should these requests be made (evidently some students who contacted the College Board by phone have already been granted the waiver)?
- If a student elects to retest in October, will the earlier test be automatically deleted from the record? Or will the student and/or colleges still have access to those scores? In fact, how will the decision to retest be reflected in the record? This is obviously a huge matter for students applying to colleges that do not participate in Score Choice.
- Is it possible for families to request a refund for the June test instead of opting for an October retest (it appears that this may have already been an option for some)? Again, if a refund is provided, will the test scores be cancelled and totally removed from the record?
- For those who decide to report June test results to colleges, will the timing and scoring problems be reflected in the record? In other words, will the results appear with an asterisk (*) indicating that not all sections of the test were scored?
Rumors have been circulating about alternate or special
make-up test dates as an option for June test-takers. The College Board has scheduled a few
make-ups at a handful of high schools in Alaska, California, New Jersey, New
York, and Tennessee. Most have been
scheduled for June 20, and presumably they were scheduled to cover other
kinds of problems encountered on June 6.
For now, the College Board plans to offer no June retake for
anyone else—it would be an extremely expensive proposition—despite the fact
that scores from October will not be available until October 22. This places extreme pressure on students,
applying for certain scholarships or under various early admission programs, who
worry scores will not be reviewable or available in time to meet some
deadlines.
By the way, the June test date is often very important for
students deciding if and where to apply early.
Without benefit of scores they trust or want reported, students may face
an additional application strategy problem.
Wouldn’t this be the perfect opportunity to offer a September test date?
But even if an official June (or September) retest were
offered, questions remain about the reporting and validity of the June 6 test.
So what should students who had negative testing experiences
in June do? Wait for the next chapter
from the College Board.
No comments:
Post a Comment