In the old days, applying to
college required a dependable typewriter and gallons of correction fluid.
Although it was a tedious process that kept application production to a
minimum, final documents told a story and reflected something about the care
with which the entire application package was put together.
These days, every document submitted through an electronic system like the Common Application looks exactly the same—tediously the same. Instead of style and neatness, what differentiates applications is attention to small details and the ability to navigate limitations imposed by the software controlling the submission.
And keep in mind, what colleges see is exactly what you see when you preview the document.
These days, every document submitted through an electronic system like the Common Application looks exactly the same—tediously the same. Instead of style and neatness, what differentiates applications is attention to small details and the ability to navigate limitations imposed by the software controlling the submission.
And keep in mind, what colleges see is exactly what you see when you preview the document.
So it's up to you to check for accuracy,
completeness, and how well the document “presents” to readers looking at
hundreds of virtually identical forms.
This holds true for the Common Application, the Universal College Application (UCA) or most other applications you submit electronically.
This holds true for the Common Application, the Universal College Application (UCA) or most other applications you submit electronically.
And this is why all
systems strongly suggest you “Print Preview” your document before
pushing the submit button—regardless of how tired you are or how close you are
coming to deadline. Otherwise, you risk sending a document that may contain
errors or is weirdly cutoff.
In case you’re curious, this is because when you complete an
application online, your response is posted in an efficient “variable-width”
typeface. Systems can only enforce a character count and cannot measure the
physical length of a response. And not all characters are created equal.
For example, the Common Application sets a
1000 character limit on the question asking you to “briefly elaborate on
one of your extracurricular activities or work experiences.” The suggested
“word” limit is 150 words or fewer. But because characters are not equal in the
amount of space they take up, your essay can easily exceed the word limit
imposed by the document.
If you doubt this is the case, try typing 1000 “W’s” or “M’s” and paste your “document” into the answer box. You’ll find that all are happily accepted by the program. Now, press preview. What you will see is only about half of your “document.” If you substitute with 1000 “i’s”, you will see all of the document plus lots of additional white space allowing for even more characters. “W’s” and “M’s” take up way more space than “i’s.”
In the Common Application, the problem occurs not only in
the short answer section but also in the fill-in-the blank responses in the
“Extracurricular Activities and Work Experience” section. Even if the
application allows you to describe in detail all the awards and honors you
received as a member of your high school dance team, it’s possible they will
not all show up on the documents colleges actually read.
A second, more obscure formatting problem involves spacing.
If you persist in hitting the “enter” key for multiple paragraphs or if you
like to write in haikus, you easily run the risk of scrolling beyond the space
allotted for an essay response, regardless of the word or character limit. The
Common Application appears to allow no more than eight single lines in the 150
word short answer, even if those lines are single words and fall well within
all limitations.
Finally, please be aware that neither the Common App nor the
UCA “spellchecks” your documents.
For those of you who print previewed your documents after
pushing the “submit” button and noted some truncating, don’t despair. If you
stayed within the character limit—in other words, if the application allowed
you to type your entire answer, the data is still there. It is available to
readers if they care to take the time to go back into the system and read the
complete answer.
I won’t lie to you, however. It’s not easy to retrieve the
data, and it’s extremely unlikely that the average admissions reader will
bother.
And sad to say, spelling errors are yours to own.
Keep in mind that you may correct both of these problems
in "alternate"
versions of your electronic application. You cannot resend, but you can make
corrections for applications you send in the future.
So what should you do? Preview—not
just for typos but also for what shows up on the document.
If truncating occurs
in such a way that the response makes no sense, go back and edit. Look for
extra words and tighten up your prose or paragraphing. For other responses, use
standard or easy-to-understand abbreviations (capt. for captain). Do not use
text-speak or nonstandard abbreviations.
Unfortunately, there is a little more bad news for users of
the Common Application. The Common App’s system requirements list a limited
number of “supported
browsers,” which include modern versions of Internet Explorer and Safari,
among others. Students using Safari, however, have reported problems previewing
applications. And anyone using an older version of Internet Explorer or Chrome
could be out of luck.
Hopefully, these issues will be corrected in next
year’s version of the Common App. For now, you’ll just have to put up with
the inconvenience and move your operation to a computer using a supported
browser. You can go through some gyrations to make it work, but frankly, it’s usually
easier to simply move computers.
By the way, the Universal
College Application does not have similar browser limitations or issues.
In the event you are experiencing problems with your online
application, do not hesitate to contact the various “support centers." But
whatever you do, don’t wait until the last minute. Responses can be
significantly delayed depending on traffic to the site.
No comments:
Post a Comment